Buy this shirt: https://nbnpremium.com/product/watsky-matchstick-shirt/
Anyone who says that there is a certain amount of material that is automatically acceptable (20 seconds, 10 seconds, 5 pages, etc.) is not understanding copyright law and is serving a common myth. Nonprofit status is not a passport, it is just one of four usage factors considered when determining whether use is fair. The four-part fair use test is: No judge to decide on YouTube copyright strikes. YouTube users must convince the Watsky matchstick shirt but I will buy this shirt and I will love this copyright owner that their use is fair use. It may seem like an undue burden on YouTube users, but it’s much better than going to court and having both sides defend their case before a judge. First, piracy almost always means no civil jail time. Going to jail requires running a large fake gang, and it’s not clear which YouTube logo is suitable for large-scale counterfeiting.
Let’s say you get videos from YouTube showing people’s political tricks and set up a channel called YouRube. Comments/sarcasm can be protected by exception. Let’s say you take the Watsky matchstick shirt but I will buy this shirt and I will love this YouTube logo and put it on a product. It’s likely that it’s no longer protected as it’s no longer commented/sarcastic. It is just a product. Or suppose you invented a lubricant for self-satisfaction after a long period of research. We may call it YouLube because YouTube only controls the use of this name (and its confusing variations) in certain market segments. However, if you try to use a modified logo, you will inevitably be sued for trademark infringement. However, if you are not covered by the very limited fair use exemption, contact the owner and request the terms of the ‘Copyright Use License’ agreement, then pay.
Home: https://nbnpremium.com/
Comments